Please call to schedule your free initial consultation: 403.262.1110|melanie@yycdefence.ca

Appeal Lawyers Calgary

Sitar & Milczarek

Criminal Appeals & Complex Trials

The Defence Toolkit

clawbies-winner-2020
[dsm_breadcrumbs separator_bg_color=”RGBA(255,255,255,0)” _builder_version=”4.23.1″ _module_preset=”default” items_text_color=”#CB9231″ separators_text_color=”#CCCCC3″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/dsm_breadcrumbs]

The Defence Toolkit serves up summaries and commentary on the editor’s choice of the three best Canadian criminal defence cases every week. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn to get notified of new posts.

The Defence Toolkit – December 20, 2025: Christmas Cheer from the Courts

This week's top three summaries: R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43: s.9 #arrest, R v Stuart, 2025 ABCA 404: #cross & s.276, R v Linklater, 2025 MBCA 104: #eye-witness ID R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 [December 12, 2025] Charter s.9 - The Power to Arrest is Limited by s. 495(2) [Reasons by Côté J. with Wagner C.J., and Karakatsanis, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and M,  concurring] AUTHOR'S NOTE: The police power of arrest is constrained not only by the requirement of reasonable grounds,...

The Defence Toolkit – December 6, 2025: Courtroom Confrontation

This week's top three summaries: R v McDonald, 2025 ONCA 807: Browne v Dunn, R v Brennan, 2025 ONSC 6116: s.8 #marijuana smell, R v MR, 2025 ONCA 789: #appeal bail R v McDonald, 2025 ONCA 807 [November 25, 2025] The Rule in Browne v Dunn [Reasons by Fairburn A.C.J.O., with David M. Paciocco and A. Harvison Young JJ.A. concurring] AUTHOR'S NOTE: The Rule in Browne v. Dunn is grounded in trial fairness, which means its application is highly fact-specific. The jurisprudence does not require...

The Defence Toolkit – November 29, 2025: Cutthroat Fallout

This week's top three summaries: R v Demetroff, 2025 ABCA 373: #after the fact, R v BR, 2025 ABKB 659: s.8 school #principal, R v Robinson, 2025 ABCJ 196: #witnesses R v Demetroff, 2025 ABCA 373 [November 14, 2025] W(D): Statements led by the Crown, After the Fact Conduct: Proven False Statements, Bad Character Evidence [Jolaine Antonio, Kevin Feth, and Tamara Friesen JJ.A.] AUTHOR'S NOTE: This case deals with the W(D) instruction, After the Fact Conduct, and Bad Character Evidence. In a...
The Defence Toolkit-  November 8, 2025: Mandatory Minimums

The Defence Toolkit- November 8, 2025: Mandatory Minimums

This week's top three summaries: Quebec (AG) v Senneville, 2025 SCC 33: min #sentence, R v Hutton, 2025 ABCA 356: 271 mens rea, R v Backfat, 2025 ABCJ 183: #delayed counsel and release Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33 [October 31, 2025] Charter...

The Defence Toolkit – November 1, 2025: The Good Samaritan

The Defence Toolkit – November 1, 2025: The Good Samaritan

This week's top three summaries: R v Wilson, 2025 SCC 32: #GoodSamaritan, R v Ukuqtunnuaq, 2025 NUCA 8: #fresh evidence, R v Liu, 2025 SKCA 98: #expert evidence R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32 [October 24, 2025] The Good Samaritan Exception to Drug Possession [Majority...

The Defence Toolkit – October 18, 2025: Criminal Defence Crisis

The Defence Toolkit – October 18, 2025: Criminal Defence Crisis

This week's top three summaries: R v BN, 2025 ABKB 535: #ineffective lawyer, R v Shah, 2025 ABKB 535: s.8 #informant, R v Mohamed Mussa, 2025 ABKB 543: #circumstantial ID R. v. BN, 2025 ABKB 535 [September 18, 2025] Ineffective Assistance of Counsel [Justice C.D....

Browse Popular Categories

Evidence

Sentencing

Charter s.8

Appeals

Credibility

Sexual Assault

More Articles

The Defence Toolkit – August 30, 2025: A Group Attack

The Defence Toolkit – August 30, 2025: A Group Attack

This week's top three summaries: R v Sels, 2025 ONCA 592: #defence v group, R v Singh, 2025 ONCA 498: directed #verdict guilty?, R v Pierre, 2025 ABCA 589: #instructions after-the-fact R v Sels, 2025 ONCA 592 [August 14, 2025] Self Defence: Against a Perceived Group...

The Defence Toolkit – August 16, 2025: Reasons for Non-Consent

The Defence Toolkit – August 16, 2025: Reasons for Non-Consent

This week's top three summaries: R v PE, 2025 ABCA 272: prior #victimization, R v Thomson, 2025 ONCA 500: s.10(b) strip #search, R v Harding, 2025 ABCA 266: preventing #cross R v PE, 2025 ABCA 272 [August 8, 2025] Crown-led Sexual History Evidence: Prior Sexual...

The lawyers at Sitar & Milczarek love written advocacy and ghostwriting services

Our lawyers have been litigating criminal trials and appeals for over 16 years in courtrooms throughout Canada. We can be of assistance to your practice. Whether you are looking for an appeal referral or some help with a complex written argument, our firm may be able to help. Our firm provides the following services available to other lawyers for referrals or contract work:

  1. Criminal Appeals
  2. Complex Criminal Litigation
  3. Ghostwriting Criminal Legal Briefs

Please review the rest of the website to see if our services are right for you.

Stay Up to Date With The Latest News & Updates

Follow Us

Keep up to date with latest news and content in criminal law